![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMXbZobzCdonD4lLlFHh8inXykHrGnP_S6YINi8LFsV_TcEvsoLpZ9KX1ZBhuWilY0cEs2Xbjl1RlGiEKP3K4VFbkuqbBsHDkbyZsTYkQFWaZ74UWDkUP-G7n8GVRDG_kUVWXzs631jvl_/s320/decisions.jpg)
Once Professor Kurpis gave us control of making a decision in which 100% of the class should agree on, someone immediately took on the leadership role. It was definitely necessary, especially with a class as large as ours. The leader was able to keep the class organized and she was also able to multitask. She not only got everyone's input but she also recorded everyone's ideas on the board to keep track. The process we went through to come up with our decision was effective, as long as everybody participated in it. The main problem i saw, was time. I felt that getting everyone's opinion individually, was too time consuming. This caused us to rush some of the ideas. So we rushed the final decision. I think the ideal way to go through the process, is to separate the class into several groups. Let each group come to a decision that each person in the group can agree on. Then after every group has come to an agreement, each group can present their ideas. Then the whole class can come to a decision based on every groups alternatives. Based on the way people handle conflict, I feel that I took on the compromising position. I also think that the class used the compromising method because some of the ideas were composed of two different ideas. This helped gain the satisfaction of those people that disagreed with one or the other. I think that method was ideal because each side was satisfied. I think that the compromising method is effective. Because when two people are in disagreement, compromising can help provide a solution that both sides can agree on.